ABSTRACT
Objective: To estimate the prevalence of Chronic renal failure (CRF) in the Indian subcontinent and to identify risk factors and treatment regimens for CRF. Methods: A prospective observational study was carried out for 7 months. A total of 200 patients with a level of creatinine >1.5 mg/dl were enrolled. CRF prevalence was measured using the hospital’s inpatient department registry and medical records. The risk factors and prescribing were evaluated from the patient file report. Results: The prevalence rate of CRF was 13.7%. Male patients (59%) dominate the entire group of patients. Most patients (n = 52) were found between the age group of 71–80 years with a mean age of 62.67 ± 16.33 years. Drugs such as diuretics, and hypoglycemics were indicated to treat comorbidities. The average number of drugs per prescription were 7.43 ± 2.75 with high use of antimicrobial agents (88%). Out of 156 drugs prescribed, 76 were from essential as per essential Drug List 2017. Hypertension (P = 0.0072) and diabetes (P = 0.0084) were major concerns as risk factors followed by the drugs used for dyslipidemia, and recurrent infections. Conclusion: The prevalence rate was found to be 13.7% with significant association with risk factors such as hypertension, diabetes, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, dyslipidemia, chronic infections, smoking, and renal calculus for CRF. The pattern of prescribing was suitable and with few irrationalities.
ABSTRACT
Prokinetics are commonly used for Functional Dyspepsia (FD) and GastroEsophageal Reflux Disease (GERD). Aims and Objectives: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of cinitapride Extended-Release (ER) tablets versus conventional cinitapride Immediate-Release (IR) tablets for the treatment of FD and GERD. Materials and Methods: Patients with FD and GERD received either cinitapride ER 3 mg tablets OD or cinitapride IR 1 mg tablets TID for 4 weeks in this randomized, multicentre study. Change in the mean intensity score of gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms (overall and individual) at the end of the study and at each weekly follow up visit as compared to baseline, patients with complete resolution of GI symptoms, patients with > 50% reduction from baseline in overall intensity score, rescue medication use and overall efficacy were recorded. The safety variables were reported adverse events (AEs), laboratory parameters, electrocardiogram, and overall tolerability. Unpaired t test, chi square test or Fisher’s exact test were used for analysis. p < 0.05 was considered significant. Results: Total 218 patients were enrolled Cinitapride ER tablets were non-inferior (non-inferiority margin -2.5) to cinitapride IR tablets for the change in the mean overall GI symptom intensity score at the end of the study as compared to the baseline (treatment difference - 0.2 (95% CI: -2.2, 1.7)); also, no significant difference was found for other efficacy variables (p > 0.05). Eight AEs of mild-to-moderate intensity were reported. There was also no difference in the overall tolerability between the study groups (p = 0.875). Conclusions : Both the study treatments were comparable in terms of safety and efficacy for the treatment of FD and GERD.